Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas
That's actually an irrelevant question. Even if you're defending yourself, the moment you go from defending to trying to cause grievous harm you become in the wrong.
|
Wait, what? Grevious harm like shooting someone?
Quote:
|
Regardless of who struck first, once Martin started smashing Zimmerman's head against the sidewalk, Zimmerman was the one with the right to defend himself.
|
There's actually no forensic evidence to back that up. Had it been 25 times like Zimmerman said, he'd be in a lot worse shape. Trayvon had none of Zimmerman's blood or DNA on him, just a scrape on one of his knuckles. All the eyewitnesses played them on the grass, where Trayvon's body was found.