I went ahead and read those articles. And what I'm wondering is how the idea of cooking being advantageous and most likely an incredibly important factor, negates the idea of adding meat to the diet being a big factor in the evolution of the human brain.
Unless you're trying to tell me that the addition of meat to the early hominid had little or nothing to do with the evolution of the human brain, we can pretty much agree, because I'm nowhere near believing that only one factor would have to be responsible for the development of complex features in a species.
I'm quite familiar with far more, as I really enjoy studying Evolutionary Anthropology even more than I enjoy reading myths, legends and subtitles.