Quote:
Originally Posted by Saya
That knowledge can only be meaningful if you understand it, and if its true. What I learned was true in high school science is actually now considered pretty inaccurate, its not meant to be solid knowledge to hold onto, just what we can know for now. Science and spirituality deal with totally different things and its not just one or the other.
|
Would you mind letting me know when prayer can start regenerating amputee limbs? Someone's understanding of science can be wrong and can be updated, but even if their scientific understanding is wrong, it's fallacious to seek out a spiritual explanation to actual real and rational explanations.
*sigh* This is also where we both bump heads. You tend to tread into territory that sounds like you think we live in some kind of fantasy world much like... I don't even know. Something to do with fairies and shit like "souls".
Saya, please don't make the mistake of saying that spirituality is immune to scientific inquiry or that spirituality is actually real because we can't prove it doesn't exist. That kind of shit permits any kind of half baked fever dreams to be held as truth and that is... well, stupid.
Or are you talking about shit that's actually psychological and not so supernatural?
Maybe I don't know what the word spirituality means. When I hear that word, I understand it as something transcendent of this material world such as supernatural or special extra natural connections to something that ISN'T material and is independent of the mind. Much like the concept of a soul.
It's not that I have this weird notion that it's either one or the other, science or spirituality. It is that one is measurably verifiable and correct even if it needs to be amended. The other is speculation, wishful thinking, and confirmation bias.
You come off as if spirituality (again maybe you're changing the definition of the word where psychology would be more appropriate) is some kind of empirical truth. Almost as if you're saying people AREN'T being delusional or they're NOT being hysterical or they're NOT hallucinating. I'm almost starting to think it wouldn't be beyond you to think speaking in tongues is empirical evidence of Yahwey.