Sexual Orientation. - Page 2

Opteron_Man · 04-06-2008, 10:02 PM

gothicusmaximus is pretty attactive.

Wormboy · 04-06-2008, 10:51 PM

I never really judge by gender, more by how someone looks. I really just look for a personality and an aesthetic, though it doesn't have to be restricted to any gender. It's all good. In fact I think MANY transsexuals/transvestites/gender fucks are absolutely gorgeous *cough* electrosexual *cough*

LaBelleDameSansMerci · 04-06-2008, 11:16 PM

I voted straight, but I'm not 100% sure. I'm very shy, and I have almost no sex drive whatsoever, so *shrug*

Speaking of gorgeous transvestites, I saw pictures of a guy who made a prettier girl than me. >.<

KontanKarite · 04-07-2008, 01:06 AM

If I didn't have this awesome GF, I'd so date Electrosexual. He's a cutie.

drewsilla · 04-07-2008, 01:15 AM

I voted straight. Don't have a problem with the others, just love the boys, my husband in particular!

ScarletWitch · 04-07-2008, 02:47 PM

I voted bisexual, though I was leaning towards pansexual. It's a tough call. I like people for who they are, regardless of genitalia. But I'll admit if you're attractive, I'll stare. So while personality is the main thing, I feel sexual attraction to certain aspects of both men and women. Bisexual seemed to fit that best, IMHO. Best of both worlds

Catch · 04-08-2008, 01:09 PM

I am insulted! Asexuals are not even listed on this. In lue of this greivious oversight, I would probably chose someone of the opposite sex for having sex with, if wanting to have sex with someone else.

Bete Noire · 04-08-2008, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by electrosexual

As it's always been defined. You fall in love regardless of gender, and sexual attraction comes thereafter.

It's different to bisexual in that a bisexual may either go for a man or a woman depending on what body they may desire.

Shit, I should have read the thread before I voted. If I had I would have clicked Pansexual.

ionic_angel · 04-09-2008, 12:27 AM

Straight. I notice that some men are attractive, but I'm not attracted personally. I suppose it could be defined as an appreciation for the human form.

However, although I find women highly attractive personally, I can't really even consider anything physical without some kind of intense emotional/mental connection.

I mean, I won't even hold hands. I'm not a prude. Just...don't feel the need, I suppose.

So, weird straight, I guess.

electrosexual · 04-09-2008, 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Catch

I am insulted! Asexuals are not even listed on this. In lue of this greivious oversight, I would probably chose someone of the opposite sex for having sex with, if wanting to have sex with someone else.

Isn't asexual having no sexual orientation?

Mistress Lilith · 04-09-2008, 06:59 AM

I voted bisexual. I've had relationships with both genders and I suppose that I do have some pansexual tendencies. But I'm sort of bizarre too. I don't really like to be touched unless I am in a relationship with you or we have been friends for years. But if you are someone that I am confortable touching, I am insanely physical and crave contact constantly.

ThreeEyesOni · 04-09-2008, 01:34 PM

Bisexual, for the simple sake that the only difference I grant pansexual is that people put in notes about transgenders. It's a moot point, in my mind.

I generally answer stuff like this "none of your business" though. :P

Pantherlette086 · 04-09-2008, 07:23 PM

I'm straight.

Godslayer Jillian · 04-09-2008, 09:53 PM

I'm a homophobosexual!!
I crave homophobes.

Vexik · 04-10-2008, 05:49 PM

Harr, I can't believe there 'tweren't no 'wenchosexual' or 'hotlasswithapiratehatosexual!' I cast my lot in with the straighties because, um, I am.

Arrr.

Noumi · 04-10-2008, 06:39 PM

I´m straight...or bi...or... straight ?? I don´t know!!

.

By the way, what does pansexual mean??

DarkenedReveries · 04-21-2008, 03:22 PM

I'd have to go with pansexual myself.

JCC · 04-21-2008, 03:23 PM

Pansexual for me also.

BLEED REBELION!!! · 04-21-2008, 05:39 PM

I never knew what pansexual meant.. Im glad to sorta kinda know now.

On the survey thingy I put Bisexual because thats the term I've been given.

But I guess I could be called Pansexual.. I dont really care to ever have "sex" so any romatic realtionship I'm going to have wont involve many physical things except maybe some kissing. Im practically nun.

While I find different things to be atractive about the sexes, I prefer slightly more feminine features.

I like to look at people but thats about it.

I've always gotten upset that the reaction most other girls give me when they find out im "bi" is something along the lines of : "ewww! why would you want to have sex with a girl!!"

They dont see to understand that thats not what its about. Its about the emotional/mental components that I care about. Im a fricken hopeless romantic and I dnt care what gender my love is.

To bad myspace doesnt have a pan sexual option..

So I know all the religious people (or some of them) rant about how a gay relationship are bad/etc. But do they have a probem with same gender romantic realtionships if the couple is celibant? or is god (according to them) against the emotional union as well???

Sleazy_Spade · 04-21-2008, 08:09 PM

I voted pansexual as gender really makes no difference to me. Once you include transgender and gender-benders gender and biological sex really become two different things. As a person with male genitals can easily be quite convincingly female in dress, attitude, and actions.

Androgyny has been increasingly interesting of late as I explore more of my personal interests. Seeing Electrosexual's picture post was rather encouraging. I am infinitely jealous. Ive alot of work to do to look as good as he though. He is absolutely gorgeous.

ForgetThisLostLenore · 04-21-2008, 08:30 PM

I'm straight. I have kissed a girl before, but there just wasn't that attraction there. Anyways, after dealing with my one-step-from-gay ex, I realized that I much rather be ther only woman in a relationship. I've got neurotic mood-swings going for me, and I don't think adding more of that would help much. Anyways, I like being held by a guy, especially one bigger or taller than me. Just that sense of being protected, I guess. But I don't think I could ever get that with a girl. So I'm definitely straight.

AngelikDemonik · 04-21-2008, 08:46 PM

Straight, but I will be the first to admit if I think a girl is attractive or is charming.

Viruella · 04-21-2008, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KontanKarite

A romantic relationship doesn't necessarily require sexual intercourse.

True

One can fall in love with a machine, or a book.

I voted pansexual but I could describe my self as pan-asexual.
I'm not interested in sex, but I enjoy both female and male beauty and love.

this labels of one's sexual desire always lack of something

Paigeybobert · 04-21-2008, 11:19 PM

I know I'm a true pansexual. Amen.

ionic_angel · 04-22-2008, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLEED REBELION!!!

So I know all the religious people (or some of them) rant about how a gay relationship are bad/etc. But do they have a probem with same gender romantic realtionships if the couple is celibant? or is god (according to them) against the emotional union as well???

Hmm. Well, I'd say, personally, that I don't see exactly how it would be "wrong" without the "sexual immorality" part, at least from a Christian perspective. Granted, I'm not a Bible scholar, so don't take my word for it.

However, I'm not sure I'd really call it being "bisexual" without the "-sexual" part. I mean, I've found some guys very attractive, and I've been very close emotionally to some guys, but never been attracted sexually. That. in my mind, makes me "straight".